Videoconference and Remote Interpreting in Criminal Proceedings
Click here to open/download a pdf version of the table of contents. Click on the titles of the papers below to open/download pdf versions of them.
Sabine Braun and Judith L. Taylor
Introduction 1
Section 1 Framework and context
Caroline Morgan
The new European Directive on the rights to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings 5
Evert-Jan van der Vlis
Videoconferencing in criminal proceedings 11
Section 2 Video-mediated interpreting in criminal proceedings: from practice to research
Sabine Braun and Judith L. Taylor
Video-mediated interpreting: an overview of current practice and research 27
Sabine Braun and Judith L. Taylor
Video-mediated interpreting in criminal proceedings: two European surveys 59
Sabine Braun and Judith L. Taylor
AVIDICUS comparative studies – part I: Traditional interpreting and remote interpreting in police interviews 85
Katalin Balogh and Erik Hertog
AVIDICUS comparative studies – part II: Traditional, videoconference and remote interpreting in police interviews 101
Joanna Miler-Cassino and Zofia Rybinska
AVIDICUS comparative studies – part III: Traditional interpreting and videoconference interpreting in prosecution interviews 117
Dirk Rombouts
The police interview using videoconferencing with a legal interpreter: a critical view from the perspective of interview techniques 137
Jemina Napier
Here or there? An assessment of video remote signed language interpreter-mediated interaction in court 145
Section 3 Technology
Ronald van den Hoogen and Peter van Rotterdam
True-to-life requirements for using videoconferencing in legal proceedings 187
José Esteban Causo
Conference interpreting with information and communication technologies. Experiences from the European Commission DG Interpretation 199
Annex 1
Annex 2
Annex 3
Annex 4
Section 4 Training
Sabine Braun, Judith L. Taylor, Joanna Miler-Cassino, Zofia Rybinska, Katalin Balogh, Erik Hertog, Yolanda vanden Bosch and Dirk Rombouts
Training in video-mediated interpreting in criminal proceedings: modules for interpreting students, legal interpreters and legal practitioners 205
Annex 1a – Presentation for student interpreters
Annex 1b – Presentation for practising legal interpreters
Annex 1c – Presentation for legal practitioners and police officers
Annex 2 – Student handout
Section 5 Conclusions and implications
Ann Corsellis
AVIDICUS: Conclusions and implications 255
Sabine Braun
Recommendations for the use of video-mediated interpreting in criminal proceedings 265